| Dimensional Job AnalysisTM |
| JAQ Employee FLSA Exemption Analysis |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Employee
ID: 2067 |
Job
Code: ASA0002 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Employee Name:
Bradley, Mavis R. |
Job Title: Admin
Support Asst II |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| History:
We extracted those job activity items from the JAQ that
were assessed to be exempt-level work. Staff members from
the Wage and Hour Department reviewed these items, and
the result is the following list. During our discussion
with these investigators, we gleaned the types of probes
and caveats they would use in making their determination.
We offer these considerations in the Comments section
that follows each job activity to help you with your
analysis. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Guidelines:
No one item will make the determination. You must look at
the job as whole and consider those items which apply to
the particular job. Consider the frequency of time spent
on an activity as well as the level of review. If the
Review column is checked in the first or second box
(self-review or cursory review), it is clear that the
independence for judgment exists. If the third box is
checked (thorough review), do not automatically assume
that the item will not apply. Ask the question,
"Would the job incumbent be required to make
significant decisions and judgments independently prior
to the point review?" If the answer is
"yes," then the item will stand. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
A |
4 |
|
Freq. |
Review |
| |
|
|
Drafts responses to moderately
complex inquiries (e.g., description of
organizational/team policies or procedures). |
<5% |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Comments: Consider the decisions
made in composing the document. If these decisions are a
result of reiterating a straight-forward policy, this
item would not apply. However, if the actions require
some interpretation and judgment, such as determining
what the real issues are and what policy or procedure may
fit the situation, then the work activity will stand. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
B |
4 |
|
Freq.
|
Review |
| |
|
|
Identifies
relevant information and generates documents from notes
or minutes taken at management or team meetings. |
<5% |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Comments:
This job activity would only be considered if the
document was complex and of major importance to the
company, such as identifying key information in
investigation proceedings that will be placed in a
report. Simple reporting of minutes from a department
meeting that lays out agenda items and follow-up
activities would not apply here. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
C |
4 |
|
Freq.
|
Review |
| |
|
|
Administers
the purging, retention and protection of electronic or
conventional file records for the foundation. |
NA |
|
| |
|
|
Comments:
Consider this ONLY if actual discretion is used in this
activity. The incumbent must make the decision about
whether or not the company really needs to retain certain
records and documents. This activity would not apply if
the incumbent is following existing policy or defined
instruction. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
D |
5 |
|
Freq.
|
Review |
| |
|
|
Handles
information at the highest level of sensitivity (e.g.,
legal, criminal, or business investigations; donor
financials; wills and trusts; and other proprietary
information) whose disclosure would have an immediate
negative impact on the team or foundation, or
organizations, clients, and individuals.outside |
25-50% |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Comments:
Here the incumbent must use judgment about what may or
may not be revealed in business discussions. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|